Here is a link to my op-ed, which was published in the Sunday, July 1, 2012 edition of The Salt Lake Tribune, regarding the United States Supreme Court’s decision on Arizona’s “attrition through enforcement,” anti-immigration law known as S.B. 1070:
Great Op-ed. I noticed something in your piece that I have been curious about for a while now and I was hoping you or Chuck could give an answer: why did the Federal government appeal to the "Supremacy Clause" instead of the "Plenary Power Doctrine" in making its case? Is it because they are essentially the same thing?